Which patches are NOT for 4.0?

[Michael Adam]

On 2012-09-25 at 11:05 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 07:54:42PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> 
> > I agree that we should consider carefully what changes make it into the
> > 4.0 branch. I'm not convinced that we need the (fairly heavyweight)
> > bugzilla-based system for that though?
> 
> Well it's what we do for released branches, and I think it works
> really well. It's up to us engineers to have the discipline to make
> it work though.

Exactly.
We also started later with the branched mode for 4.0.
Let's not step back now.

Cheers - Michael

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 206 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20120925/f631b2c8/attachment.pgp>