review tools (was Re: Code review required for commits - formal Team vote.)

[Michael Adam]

Hi Günter,

On 2012-10-23 at 04:01 +0200, Günter Kukkukk wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 23. Oktober 2012, 00:26:53 schrieb simo:
> > On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 23:51 +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
> > > Hi Simo,
> > > 
> > > On 2012-10-22 at 13:22 -0400, simo wrote:
> > > > Ok, I've set up an instance on my server.
> > > > 
> > > > Just go to http://patchwork.samba.org and you should be redirected to
> > > > the proper site.
> 
> Simo, thanks for setting up some basic stuff,
> 
> but - even if the current "patchwork" setup might only be used
> during a testing period for reviews - i think, it _must_ be
> hosted by a "samba admin controlled" domain. (as usual..)
> 
> So, please no redirection.

I guess Simo was simple the fastest in setting this up for
testing. If we decide to use patchwork, it will of course be
installed as a native samba.org server/service.

Cheers - Michael

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 206 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20121023/be539e7f/attachment.pgp>