review tools (was Re: Code review required for commits - formal Team vote.)
mat at matws.net
Wed Oct 17 10:14:55 MDT 2012
Link return a 404 not found.
David Disseldorp <ddiss at suse.de> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:53:19 -0400
Ira Cooper <ira at samba.org> wrote:
> Note: I don't care if it is Gerrit, or just a set of python scripts on
> sn that say "this e-mail topic is active... this one is being reviewed
> by x, this one is closed."
> Nobody says this has to be complex. It as complex as we want to make
> it, I explicitly stuck to giving requirements for a reason. How to
> implement those requirements in a non-odious way is another topic. :)
I've used patchworks in the past and can recommend it. It is non-
intrusive such that the ML remains authoritative, and people can ignore
it if they so choose.
Git + a mailing list should remain the only mandatory review tools IMO.
More information about the samba-technical