[PATCH] Always build SWAT
abartlet at samba.org
Tue Oct 2 16:29:31 MDT 2012
You added this switch back in 2007 with
Author: James Peach <jpeach at samba.org>
Date: Wed May 23 20:46:07 2007 +0000
r23097: Add a new configure option to disable building SWAT (it is
still built by
(This used to be commit 910d498a0e44d1c2b76ccddef0cf05e693cf580e)
I'm just curious, was there any particular reason not to build swat
(compared with not packaging it?).
It's not that SWAT is really important either way, but I'm just trying
to understand motivations as I argue for having less ./configure
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 11:39 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> While browsing configure.in and ./configure --help I noticed we allow
> the user the choice of if we should build swat. SWAT may be old, but it
> remains supported and I think we should where possible remove complexity
> from our build system.
> If folks want to keep this, I'm quite happy, I just noticed it.
> Andrew Bartlett
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
More information about the samba-technical