about patchwork

[simo]

On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 21:59 -0800, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> On 11/22/2012 06:02 PM, simo wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 12:22 -0800, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> >> Hi Simo,
> >>
> >> I'm wondering if there is a way to make patchwork a bit smater, for the
> >> moment it catch pretty any emails with a patch not only those for
> >> reviews also I would expect it to somehow group in one "thread" multiple
> >> versions of the same patch (that is to say a patch that is discussed
> >> several time in the same thread).
> >>
> >> Do you have any clue if this is  achievable goals ?
> > Yeah, I have some plans to contribute code upstream to do that, but have
> > been rather busy lately.
> > As for catching any patch, well that's patchwork work, not sure it can
> > read the mind of the sender to understand if the patch is for review or
> > not :)
> Well I might have misunderstood but it seems that having [PATCH] in the 
> subject is the sign for a review request.
> If not we could use this information to filter patches for reviews and 
> others.

When sending a patch, you can mark them setting a header, but that is
not very friendly unless you are using a MUA like mutt that makes adding
headers simple.

I think the easiest way is to just go in the patchwork interface and
mark patches one does not care about as not applicable, and archived.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <simo at samba.org>
Principal Software Engineer at Red Hat, Inc. <simo at redhat.com>