A DRAFT statement on our build systems for Samba 4.0
jra at samba.org
Thu May 17 22:15:21 MDT 2012
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 02:13:22PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 20:54 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 01:42:46PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > That is why, despite the demand, I'm hesitant to create a 'not AD DC'
> > > build, because there is challenge in defining where to define the line.
> > Doesn't the "not AD DC" build come naturally when MIT krb5 is
> > selected instead of Heimdal ?
> Sort of. Currently the patches just disable the KDC and a couple of
> other things, but leaves most of the build intact.
> You would be correct to note that this could be quite a confusing result
> for our users, and we should probably exclude at least the AD server
> binaries and provisioning tools.
Yes, that makes sense to me.
More information about the samba-technical