A DRAFT statement on our build systems for Samba 4.0

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 20:54 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 01:42:46PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> 
> > That is why, despite the demand, I'm hesitant to create a 'not AD DC'
> > build, because there is challenge in defining where to define the line.
> 
> Doesn't the "not AD DC" build come naturally when MIT krb5 is
> selected instead of Heimdal ?

Sort of.  Currently the patches just disable the KDC and a couple of
other things, but leaves most of the build intact.  

You would be correct to note that this could be quite a confusing result
for our users, and we should probably exclude at least the AD server
binaries and provisioning tools. 

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org