A DRAFT statement on our build systems for Samba 4.0
abartlet at samba.org
Thu May 17 22:13:22 MDT 2012
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 20:54 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 01:42:46PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > That is why, despite the demand, I'm hesitant to create a 'not AD DC'
> > build, because there is challenge in defining where to define the line.
> Doesn't the "not AD DC" build come naturally when MIT krb5 is
> selected instead of Heimdal ?
Sort of. Currently the patches just disable the KDC and a couple of
other things, but leaves most of the build intact.
You would be correct to note that this could be quite a confusing result
for our users, and we should probably exclude at least the AD server
binaries and provisioning tools.
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
More information about the samba-technical