Make ACL headers required by default for Samba 4.0
jra at samba.org
Mon May 14 11:11:43 MDT 2012
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 07:00:09PM +0200, steve wrote:
> On 05/14/2012 06:48 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> >On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 06:11:17PM +0200, steve wrote:
> >>On 05/13/2012 08:11 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >>>What do folks think?
> >>Hi everyone
> >>Could we please have acl support on the underlying file system
> >>honored by s3fs?
> >>IOW if there's already an acl set, then we do not change it into
> >>something else?
> >That's the goal :-), and it should be the same as on an S3 fileserver
> >where this already works.
> Ah. I see. Does this explain the problems described here:
> where s3fs changes the acl to something else?
No, I haven't even looked at this yet. You'll have to be
More information about the samba-technical