What ACL options woudl be best for s3fs?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 05:21 +0100, Günter Kukkukk wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 March 2012 00:50:06 Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > I'm not particularly failure with all the various ACL options available
> > in smbd, so I figured it was better to ask rather than guess:
> > 
> > What options should we use for ACLs on a AD DC, where we must have
> > perfect AD ACL semantics?
> > 
> > Is there any known issues with these modules and the Samba4 ACL setting,
> > particularly as done in provision? (I recall something about different
> > xattr names, so wanted to check).
> > 
> > What options are available for hosts that do not support extended
> > attributes?  Samba4 sets an option to store everything into a TDB in
> > this case, and this is used a lot in make test.  What option should I
> > set for smbd, other than:
> > 
> > vfs objects = $vfs_modulesdir_abs/xattr_tdb.so
> > $vfs_modulesdir_abs/streams_depot.so
> > 
> > Eventually I want to make these hard-coded defaults, so I would like to
> > get them right.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Andrew Bartlett
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> when you would have followed Tridge's friendly approach to nearly
> _always_ referring to the person, who made a patch ... or started
> a discussion, you would have mentioned that i started the
> the xattr/ACL discussion on IRC.
> 
> It's frustrating when such info is just "consumed" by anyone.
> (without any notice)

Günter,

I'm sorry if I have offended, and I appreciate your continued interest
in s3fs.  

Sorry,

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org