Plans for pdb_ads and auth_netlogond?
jra at samba.org
Mon Jun 25 09:30:31 MDT 2012
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:54:01PM -0700, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> If not let's keep them for 4.0 to give this code a chance (mostly
> the same thing that we did with ntvfs with the noticeable exception
> that ntvfs allowed a decent AD experience although not perfect).
> Can we agree that:
> * for 4.1 we (== people interested in keeping this code) would have
> introduced some unit tests
> * for 4.2 development in (or related) to those module a restarted
> Failing to comply with this would mean that we should seriously
> consider the removal of this modules ?
> Comments ?
+1 from me. Very reasonable approach - thanks !
More information about the samba-technical