Plans for pdb_ads and auth_netlogond?

[simo]

On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 07:33 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote: 
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 02:56:43PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 12:08 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > I don't think that I can give input that is deemed worth any
> > > consideration on this matter.
> > 
> > Sorry,
> > 
> > I'm not really sure what you mean by that.
> > 
> > Are you OK with the patch, or do you have plans to develop these into
> > something that we use?
> 
> They are still my preferred way to let smbd3 access the
> directory. You have decided that linking instead of ipc is
> the better way to integrate components. Your approach has
> more support in the community than mine,

I am not sure that is true. I made it clear earlier that I think the
linking approach is wrong, and I do prefer the forking and executing of
smbd.

> and as I do not
> have the time to develop them against your efforts on my
> own, it is only logical to remove them.

I would rather keep them around, I want to discuss the File Server
approach later, perhaps at the SDC conference.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <simo at samba.org>
Principal Software Engineer at Red Hat, Inc. <simo at redhat.com>