Samba 4.0 beta2 in two weeks time, roadmap to release?

John H Terpstra jht at
Tue Jun 5 18:07:16 MDT 2012

On 06/05/2012 12:15 PM, steve wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 04:08 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>> Would it be too soon to attempt another beta on 19 June?
>> What do folks think?
> It would be a good idea.
> How about renaming s3fs?
> We would suggest s4fs

Why Steve?  Why rename without any real change in the file server
functionality?  We do not change the name for giggles!  Every name
change impacts a lot of integrators who rely on our consistency.  I'm
totally against renaming s3fs unless there is real and significant
change or real and significant benefit to the integrator and to the end

- John T.

More information about the samba-technical mailing list