Samba 4.0 beta2 in two weeks time, roadmap to release?
steve at steve-ss.com
Tue Jun 5 18:26:52 MDT 2012
On 06/06/2012 02:07 AM, John H Terpstra wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 12:15 PM, steve wrote:
>> On 06/05/2012 04:08 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>> Would it be too soon to attempt another beta on 19 June?
>>> What do folks think?
>> It would be a good idea.
>> How about renaming s3fs?
>> We would suggest s4fs
> Why Steve? Why rename without any real change in the file server
> functionality? We do not change the name for giggles! Every name
> change impacts a lot of integrators who rely on our consistency. I'm
> totally against renaming s3fs unless there is real and significant
> change or real and significant benefit to the integrator and to the end
> - John T.
No problem. s3fs is fine. It was just a marketing issue someone
I am the only English speaker on our team. Trying to translate and
represent us all is not easy and can at times transfer incorrect
interpretations. We are simple Java coders who can but try to help by
testing. Our C is practically non existent.
More information about the samba-technical