Samba 4.0 beta2 in two weeks time, roadmap to release?

steve steve at
Tue Jun 5 18:26:52 MDT 2012

On 06/06/2012 02:07 AM, John H Terpstra wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 12:15 PM, steve wrote:
>> On 06/05/2012 04:08 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>> Would it be too soon to attempt another beta on 19 June?
>>> What do folks think?
>> It would be a good idea.
>> How about renaming s3fs?
>> We would suggest s4fs
> Why Steve?  Why rename without any real change in the file server
> functionality?  We do not change the name for giggles!  Every name
> change impacts a lot of integrators who rely on our consistency.  I'm
> totally against renaming s3fs unless there is real and significant
> change or real and significant benefit to the integrator and to the end
> user.
> - John T.
Hi John

No problem. s3fs is fine. It was just a marketing issue someone 
mentioned here.

I am the only English speaker on our team. Trying to translate and 
represent us all is not easy and can at times transfer incorrect 
interpretations. We are simple Java coders who can but try to help by 
testing. Our C is practically non existent.


More information about the samba-technical mailing list