[PATCH] [RFC] moving samba tool tests to dedicated directory
jelmer at samba.org
Mon Oct 17 14:44:27 MDT 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 10/17/2011 10:15 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 03:56 PM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>> Hi Sean,
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 03:20:45PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
>>> I'd like to move and extend samba-tool blackbox testing. The
>>> following rfc patch would duplicate the existing samba-tool time
>>> test as an example. The goal here would be making it easy to add in
>>> tests for all of the samba-tool commands to verify the tool in our
>>> This test can be run with:
>>> make test TESTS=samba4.blackbox.samba_tool.time
>>> the time test is really simple, so the power of this will be seen on
>>> things like user. But before going down that road too far I'd like
>>> to get early review on this.
>> Thanks for helping improve the unit tests for samba-tool.
>> Please add new tests under samba.tests, where the existing tests for
>> reside, rather than under samba.netcmd. Your tests also seem to
>> of the infrastructure that is already present in the tests there (see
>> including the functionality to easily run samba-tool subcommands.
> Ok, do you mean under source4/scripting/python/samba/tests/blackbox ?
Where samba_tool_drs.py exists? Is see there is some existing python
helpers there which I'd not yet found.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical