[Release Planning 3.6] Samba 3.6.0pre2
kseeger at samba.org
Sat Mar 5 06:17:52 MST 2011
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 04:08:50PM +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > As I have the impression that at least master is way better tested and
> > at least used sporadically by developers (unlike 3.6), I strongly vote
> > for option b). But its not up to me to make that decision and then again
> > I can fully understand anyone voting against.
> I've tried to backport my endpoint mapper changes to v3-6-test but there where
> a lot of changes in common code by Andrew Bartlet which haven't been
> backported to v3-6-test. There is more stuff like the merge of the debug code
> which isn't in v3-6-test too.
> So my question is, could we rebranch again?
yes, we can! ;-)
Do other team members have any objections?
More information about the samba-technical