[Release Planning 3.6] Samba 3.6.0pre2
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Fri Mar 4 10:56:21 MST 2011
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 04:08:50PM +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Thursday 18 November 2010 23:38:49 Guenther Deschner wrote:
> > Hi Karolin,
> Hey Karolin,
> > As I have the impression that at least master is way better tested and
> > at least used sporadically by developers (unlike 3.6), I strongly vote
> > for option b). But its not up to me to make that decision and then again
> > I can fully understand anyone voting against.
> I've tried to backport my endpoint mapper changes to v3-6-test but there where
> a lot of changes in common code by Andrew Bartlet which haven't been
> backported to v3-6-test. There is more stuff like the merge of the debug code
> which isn't in v3-6-test too.
> So my question is, could we rebranch again?
Probably we just have to port those changes. It is
inevitable given the churn happening in master.
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
More information about the samba-technical