Review on crackname patch
Matthieu Patou
mat at samba.org
Sat Jul 30 15:08:47 MDT 2011
Hello Metze & Tridge,
Can one of you have a look on the first patch and check the resolution.
The problem is that Samba didn't manage without this patch to do a
crackname on name that are related to deleted objects.
I found this problem when debuging a replication problems on a server
with deleted objects.
This problem can quite easily be checked:
1) locate the guid of the "Deleted objects container on a Windows DC
2) Run:
python source4/scripting/devel/crackname ip_server -U administrator
--name='{objectGUID}'
3) See that Windows return something
4) locate the guid of the "Deleted Objects" on a samba DC
5) Run:
python source4/scripting/devel/crackname ip_server_samba -U
administrator --name='{objectGUID2}'
6) See that samba return None + status name not resolved
After applying my patch step 5 returns a correct DN.
Note: the crackname script is in the second patch.
--
Matthieu Patou
Samba Team http://samba.org
Private repo http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0002-s4-drsuapi-crackname-search-also-for-deleted-objects.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20110731/4dd60c28/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-s4-create-a-small-script-to-test-drsuapi-crackname.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3015 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20110731/4dd60c28/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list