Disable SMB2 for 3.6?

[simo]

On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 22:45 +1000, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> +1 for what Volker says.
> 
> If it has been in there for months and no one has noticed. It means
> virtually no real world exposure.
> Who knows what else will show up after a few more kilo/mega-hours of real use.
> 
> No one benefits from a "uncertain quality release".
> Better drop SMB2 from the release until such stage it is both well
> tested, mature and stable.
> 
> 
> Volkers data suggests it is neither well tested nor mature so
> therefore I think it should be dropped.
> 
> Drop smb2 for now, and add it back later.

We'd release nothing if this was the criteria.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <simo at samba.org>
Principal Software Engineer at Red Hat, Inc. <simo at redhat.com>