kill security=share and security=server

[Jeremy Allison]

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 03:42:13PM -0500, simo wrote:
> Why should we care to that level ?

To try to not break people with previously working configs.

> I am a big fan of not breaking configurations that "work", but share and
> smb2 are at odds, and we are just faking stuff at this point.

Well this is why I like the proposed patch. It removes
all trace of share level security for SMB1 and SMB2 and
gets rid of that old albatros once and for all - in a
way that doesn't break any existing configs :-).