kill security=share and security=server

[simo]

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 12:34 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:27:45PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> 
> > >From my point of view anybody using security=share these
> > days seems not really interested in latest features and
> > speed. I would really like to see us to limit sec=share
> > configs to smb1. Everyone who wants SMB2 needs to change to
> > security=user anyway, because security=share is not
> > supported in SMB2.
> 
> But that's exactly what we're doing. We're just not
> making them change their smb.conf.

Why should we care to that level ?

I am a big fan of not breaking configurations that "work", but share and
smb2 are at odds, and we are just faking stuff at this point.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <simo at samba.org>
Principal Software Engineer at Red Hat, Inc. <simo at redhat.com>