modification of userAccountControl according to MS-SAMR 3.1.1.8.1.

[Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer]

Okay, here a patch proposal. Would you like to write some testcases for 
sam.py or should I take care of this?

Cheers,
Matthias

Kamen Mazdrashki wrote:
> Ah Matthias, sorry. I wasn't quite correct (I am clearly not thinking
> very well these days. Perhaps I've lost my mind in 2010)
>
> We are passing 66080, which is 0x10220.
> So, we have UF_PASSWD_NOTREQD already set.
>
> I think what is wrong with the code you've posted is that we are
> checking _current_ value of userAccountControl.
> While docs state that we should check _previous_ value for
> userAccountControl.
> When we are adding new record, we have no previous state, so I think
> we should assume prev-userAccountControl = 0.
>
> I've never read MS-SAMR document (shame on me), so I wanted to
> read it first, rather than proposing a patch for something I don't understand.
>
>    

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20110114/38514d24/attachment.ksh>