[PATCH 2/7] ldb:ldbdel tool - use LDB result constants for consistency

Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer mdw at samba.org
Tue Feb 1 09:37:37 MST 2011

Yeah simo,

I agree. But which method do you prefer? "-1" or LDB errors?

Then, after this has been cleared I'm willing to rework my patches to 
comply with the decision.


simo wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 17:16 +0100, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
>> Simo,
>> any news on this? I would really like to have these patches merged.
> As I said I think the output of utils should be consistent.
> Either we always return -1, or we always return an LDB error.
> But mixing both is not a great idea. If others agree returning LDB
> errors is ok, I am fine with it. As long as all utils are consistent.
> Simo.

More information about the samba-technical mailing list