[PATCH 2/7] ldb:ldbdel tool - use LDB result constants for consistency

[Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer]

Yeah simo,

I agree. But which method do you prefer? "-1" or LDB errors?

Then, after this has been cleared I'm willing to rework my patches to 
comply with the decision.

Cheers,
Matthias

simo wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 17:16 +0100, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
>    
>> Simo,
>>
>> any news on this? I would really like to have these patches merged.
>>      
> As I said I think the output of utils should be consistent.
> Either we always return -1, or we always return an LDB error.
>
> But mixing both is not a great idea. If others agree returning LDB
> errors is ok, I am fine with it. As long as all utils are consistent.
>
> Simo.
>
>