patch for ldb: add application flags

[Stefan (metze) Metzmacher]

Am 18.04.2011 13:54, schrieb simo:
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 17:04 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:38 +0400, Matthieu Patou wrote:
>>> Hi Simo,
>>>> If the getter/setter needs to be used by the application then you have
>>>> to put it in ldb.h, ldb_modules.h is used only by modules, and should
>>>> never be required for apps using ldb.
>>>>
>>> Following our discussion on IRC this week end I understood that you were 
>>> ok with the current name and the current location of the fonctions (as 
>>> they are mostly module oriented in any case).
>>
>> They are application flags in the sense of an application with module
>> stack, right?
>>
>> The request handle and it's flags make little sense to a pure user of
>> ldb that does not need to tag requests between modules. 
> 
> On IRC I proposed to call them custom flags so may be Matthieu should
> rename "application" into "custom" everywhere.

Maybe we can combine this with my modrdn LDIF changes and change the minor
version just once...

metze

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20110418/4cca29f7/attachment.pgp>