patch for ldb: add application flags

simo idra at samba.org
Mon Apr 18 10:04:07 MDT 2011


On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 16:53 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> Am 18.04.2011 13:54, schrieb simo:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 17:04 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:38 +0400, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> >>> Hi Simo,
> >>>> If the getter/setter needs to be used by the application then you have
> >>>> to put it in ldb.h, ldb_modules.h is used only by modules, and should
> >>>> never be required for apps using ldb.
> >>>>
> >>> Following our discussion on IRC this week end I understood that you were 
> >>> ok with the current name and the current location of the fonctions (as 
> >>> they are mostly module oriented in any case).
> >>
> >> They are application flags in the sense of an application with module
> >> stack, right?
> >>
> >> The request handle and it's flags make little sense to a pure user of
> >> ldb that does not need to tag requests between modules. 
> > 
> > On IRC I proposed to call them custom flags so may be Matthieu should
> > rename "application" into "custom" everywhere.
> 
> Maybe we can combine this with my modrdn LDIF changes and change the minor
> version just once...

ack

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <simo at samba.org>
Principal Software Engineer at Red Hat, Inc. <simo at redhat.com>



More information about the samba-technical mailing list