s3 waf build status?
abartlet at samba.org
Thu Apr 14 02:37:31 MDT 2011
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 09:59 +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Thursday 14 April 2011 08:54:01 Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Günther,
> Hi Andrew,
> > How close are we to having the s3 waf build complete?
> > The reason I ask is that for NAS and other embedded vendors, this
> > installed size difference would seem to be a really big advantage:
> > waf: 57MB
> > autoconf: 127MB
> > Even if it isn't complete for the s3 release (ie, fails on some
> > non-linux platforms), do you think we could allow vendors to enable it
> > if their platform is Linux?
> There are still some problems like --with-logfilebase and --with-piddir aren't
> working. So someone who understands this strange dynconfig code needs to fix
> it. I wonder why we don't generate a simple header file with all the path set
> instead of automagically transforming it to the compiler command line ...
I can certainly look into that. Can you give me some exact examples
that fail, so I can be sure to reproduce the issue?
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
More information about the samba-technical