regenerating secrets.keytab

Aaron Solochek aarons-samba at aberrant.org
Fri Sep 3 08:51:52 MDT 2010


On 9/3/2010 9:25 AM, Aaron Solochek wrote:
> On 09/03/2010 01:11 AM, Matthieu Patou wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Andrew Bartlett" <abartlet at samba.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 18:17 -0400, Aaron Solochek wrote:
>>>> On 09/02/2010 06:11 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 18:02 -0400, Aaron Solochek wrote:
>>>>>> On 09/02/2010 05:12 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 16:29 -0400, Aaron Solochek wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'm not sure how, but my secrets.keytab is messed up.  My PDC running
>>>>>>>> samba4 is named FOO, and secrets.keytab contains 4 keys for FOO with
>>>>>>>> kvno 1.  When I run samba with -d1, I was seeing this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Failed to find FOO$@BAR.COM(kvno 6) in keytab
>>>>>>>> FILE:/usr/local/samba/private/secrets.keytab (arcfour-hmac-md5)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since I couldn't figure out how to make the keytab and ldb agree, I
>>>>>>>> hacked the keytab to set kvno =6.  Unsurprisingly that doesn't result in
>>>>>>>> a valid keytab, so now I'm just getting decrypt integrity check errors.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How can I fix this without wiping everything and starting over?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would run an upgradeprovision.  It will reset both passwords,
>>>>>>> hopefully getting everything right again in the process.  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We could potentially split out the password changing aspect of this into
>>>>>>> another helper script, or put in the periodic password changing, but for
>>>>>>> now that's the best option. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This sounds good, however, I am getting these errors:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A transaction is still active in ldb context [0x2968680] on
>>>>>> /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb
>>>>>> A transaction is still active in ldb context [0x3d74120] on
>>>>>> /usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb
>>>>>> A transaction is still active in ldb context [0x3023060] on
>>>>>> /usr/local/samba/private/secrets.ldb
>>>>>> A transaction is still active in ldb context [0x40ce300] on
>>>>>> /usr/local/samba/private/privilege.ldb
>>>>>>
>> This is sent by upgradeprovision when something really unexpected happened ... send the full output.
> 
> 
> That was the full output.  I turned on debugging and the problem was that it was:
> 
> IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
> '/usr/share/samba/setup/provision.smb.conf.dc'
> 
> indeed, my setup was located at the default /usr/local/samba/share/setup
> 
> I would suggest that the script check the default, and also that the actual
> error get reported even if --debugall and -d2 aren't specified (I don't know
> which actually enabled that error to show up).
> 
> But anyway it looks like it specifying the setup directory solved my problem,
> and I really should have checked the debugging output myself, so I apologize for
> that.
> 
> Thanks for the help.
> 
> -Aaron


Perhaps I spoke too soon.  The upgradeprovision did solve the problem of
me being unable to join a computer to the domain, and things are no
longer _completely_ broken, but when I run samba in debug mode I am
still seeing lots of these:

GSS Update(krb5)(1) Update failed:  Miscellaneous failure (see text):
Failed to find FOO$@BAR.COM(kvno 6) in keytab
FILE:/usr/local/samba/private/secrets.keytab (arcfour-hmac-md5)

or

GSS Update(krb5)(1) Update failed:  Miscellaneous failure (see text):
Failed to find FOO$@BAR.COM(kvno 1) in keytab
FILE:/usr/local/samba/private/secrets.keytab (arcfour-hmac-md5)

So it seems that somewhere something is still trying to authenticate
with old versions of those keys.  Would this be client machines with
stale tickets or something?

-Aaron


More information about the samba-technical mailing list