[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
Jelmer Vernooij
jelmer at samba.org
Thu Nov 18 08:22:25 MST 2010
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 16:14 +0100, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> What is if I simply revert my patch - since I've written also the other
> test in "sam.py"?
That would work for me. I'll leave it up to the ldb maintainers to
decide if the dn code is then still appropriately tested.
Cheers,
Jelmer
> Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 12:33 +0100, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> >
> >> sorry. Are these tests so problematic to not keep them in "api.py"? I
> >> thought it would be the right place. But if it's really not then please
> >> point me to the right file.
> >>
> > Yes, please. api.py isn't a generic testsuite for LDB. It's /just/ there
> > to ensure that the python bindings work correctly. In other words, it
> > tests pyldb.c, not common/*.c (see also the comment in the head of the
> > file).
> >
> > The tests for LDB itself are written in shell and live in
> > lib/ldb/tests/*.sh. Your DN tests are probably most appropriate in
> > lib/ldb/tests/test-generic.sh.
> >
> > I could see the argument for doing a fair chunk of the the LDB testsuite
> > in Python instead of in shell. However, that's a decision that would
> > have to be made in discussion with LDB maintainers. And such tests
> > should not be mixed with the tests for pyldb.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jelmer
> >
> >
> >> Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Matthias,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 11:44 +0100, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> commit 732ef9353dff56384e8bb01aa20d2a371cd995c2
> >>>> Author: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer<mdw at samba.org>
> >>>> Date: Thu Nov 18 09:22:07 2010 +0100
> >>>>
> >>>> s4:api.py - DN tests - test a bit more special DNs and merge the comparison tests
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Thanks for adding more tests.
> >>>
> >>> However, api.py is intended to just test that the Python bindings do the
> >>> right things (hence the name), it's not meant as an overall testsuite
> >>> for LDB itself. The testsuite for LDB itself lives in lib/ldb/tests. Can
> >>> move these changes out of api.py to the tests there ?
> >>>
> >>> Also, there is a good reason we have so many small tests rather than
> >>> bigger ones, please don't merge them. This makes it possible to spot
> >>> what exactly is broken rather than knowing that "something" is broken.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Jelmer
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> diff --git a/source4/lib/ldb/tests/python/api.py b/source4/lib/ldb/tests/python/api.py
> >>>> index b8adbaa..efb9791 100755
> >>>> --- a/source4/lib/ldb/tests/python/api.py
> >>>> +++ b/source4/lib/ldb/tests/python/api.py
> >>>> @@ -342,49 +342,74 @@ class DnTests(unittest.TestCase):
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo11,bar=bloe")
> >>>> y = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo11,bar=bloe")
> >>>> self.assertEquals(x, y)
> >>>> + y = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo11,bar=blie")
> >>>> + self.assertNotEquals(x, y)
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "")
> >>>> + y = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals(x, y)
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "cn=foo\, bar\, bar,dc=test,dc=bloe")
> >>>> + y = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "cn=foo\, bar\, bar,dc=test,dc=bloe")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals(x, y)
> >>>>
> >>>> def test_str(self):
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo12,bar=bloe")
> >>>> self.assertEquals(x.__str__(), "dc=foo12,bar=bloe")
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals(x.__str__(), "")
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "cn=foo\, bar\, bar,dc=test,dc=bloe")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals(x.__str__(), "cn=foo\, bar\, bar,dc=test,dc=bloe")
> >>>>
> >>>> def test_repr(self):
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo13,bla=blie")
> >>>> self.assertEquals(x.__repr__(), "Dn('dc=foo13,bla=blie')")
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals(x.__repr__(), "Dn('')")
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "cn=foo\, bar\, bar,dc=test,dc=bloe")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals(x.__repr__(), "Dn('cn=foo\\\\, bar\\\\, bar,dc=test,dc=bloe')")
> >>>>
> >>>> def test_get_casefold(self):
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo14,bar=bloe")
> >>>> self.assertEquals(x.get_casefold(), "DC=FOO14,BAR=bloe")
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals(x.get_casefold(), "")
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "cn=foo\, bar\, bar,dc=test,dc=bloe")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals(x.get_casefold(), "CN=FOO\, BAR\, BAR,DC=TEST,DC=BLOE")
> >>>>
> >>>> def test_validate(self):
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo15,bar=bloe")
> >>>> self.assertTrue(x.validate())
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "")
> >>>> + self.assertTrue(x.validate()) # the empty DN is valid (rootDSE)
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "cn=foo\, bar\, bar,dc=test,dc=bloe")
> >>>> + self.assertTrue(x.validate())
> >>>>
> >>>> def test_parent(self):
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo16,bar=bloe")
> >>>> self.assertEquals("bar=bloe", x.parent().__str__())
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "cn=foo\, bar\, bar,dc=test,dc=bloe")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals("dc=test,dc=bloe", x.parent().__str__())
> >>>>
> >>>> def test_parent_nonexistant(self):
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "@BLA")
> >>>> self.assertEquals(None, x.parent())
> >>>> -
> >>>> - def test_compare(self):
> >>>> - x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo17,bar=bloe")
> >>>> - y = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo17,bar=bloe")
> >>>> - self.assertEquals(x, y)
> >>>> - z = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo17,bar=blie")
> >>>> - self.assertNotEquals(z, y)
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals(None, x.parent())
> >>>>
> >>>> def test_is_valid(self):
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo18,dc=bloe")
> >>>> self.assertTrue(x.is_valid())
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "")
> >>>> - # is_valid()'s return values appears to be a side effect of
> >>>> - # some other ldb functions. yuck.
> >>>> - # self.assertFalse(x.is_valid())
> >>>> + self.assertTrue(x.is_valid()) # the empty DN is valid (rootDSE)
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "cn=foo\, bar\, bar,dc=test,dc=bloe")
> >>>> + self.assertTrue(x.is_valid())
> >>>>
> >>>> def test_is_special(self):
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo19,bar=bloe")
> >>>> self.assertFalse(x.is_special())
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "")
> >>>> + self.assertFalse(x.is_special())
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "cn=foo\, bar\, bar,dc=test,dc=bloe")
> >>>> + self.assertFalse(x.is_special())
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "@FOOBAR")
> >>>> self.assertTrue(x.is_special())
> >>>>
> >>>> @@ -399,6 +424,10 @@ class DnTests(unittest.TestCase):
> >>>> self.assertEquals(2, len(x))
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo21")
> >>>> self.assertEquals(1, len(x))
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals(0, len(x)) # the empty DN has length 0
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "cn=foo\, bar\, bar,dc=test,dc=bloe")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals(3, len(x))
> >>>>
> >>>> def test_add_child(self):
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo22,bar=bloe")
> >>>> @@ -434,11 +463,18 @@ class DnTests(unittest.TestCase):
> >>>> def test_canonical_string(self):
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo25,bar=bloe")
> >>>> self.assertEquals("/bloe/foo25", x.canonical_str())
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals("/", x.canonical_str())
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "cn=foo\, bar\, bar,dc=test,dc=bloe")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals("test.bloe/foo\, bar\, bar", x.canonical_str())
> >>>>
> >>>> def test_canonical_ex_string(self):
> >>>> x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "dc=foo26,bar=bloe")
> >>>> self.assertEquals("/bloe\nfoo26", x.canonical_ex_str())
> >>>> -
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals("\n", x.canonical_ex_str())
> >>>> + x = ldb.Dn(self.ldb, "cn=foo\, bar\, bar,dc=test,dc=bloe")
> >>>> + self.assertEquals("test.bloe\nfoo\, bar\, bar", x.canonical_ex_str())
> >>>>
> >>>> class LdbMsgTests(unittest.TestCase):
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20101118/8e810e8a/attachment.pgp>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list