ldb dn tests

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Thu Nov 18 13:48:31 MST 2010

On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 16:22 +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 16:14 +0100, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> > What is if I simply revert my patch - since I've written also the other 
> > test in "sam.py"?
> That would work for me. I'll leave it up to the ldb maintainers to
> decide if the dn code is then still appropriately tested.

C-based ldb DN tests can be added to the existing DN tests in
torture/ldb/ldb.c.  (There is a function there for normal DNs, alongside
the extended DN tests).  

These should be extended to include testing these cases, alongside
adding the shell-based tests that have been mentioned (which are part of
the official LDB distribution). 

Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20101119/de6e409e/attachment.pgp>

More information about the samba-technical mailing list