About Samba4 vs Win2008 differences
Zahari Zahariev
zahari.zahariev at gmail.com
Tue May 25 03:20:22 MDT 2010
Thank you Mathias!
I believed before I have not seen these differences with the same
configuration. I will try get results with Windows2008 (R2) for Schema and
then we will see where is the hurdle.
-Zahari
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw at samba.org>wrote:
> Thank you Zahari for providing those outputs. I pushed a huge amount of
> directory content fixes and will also integrate a fix for the non-normalised
> RDN attribute names ("CN" instead of "cn", "OU" instead of "ou"...)
> Regarding the differences in the schema objects I can do nothing (as you
> know these are MS-provided files and I won't touch them). Could the
> differences lie in the fact that you have compared the Windows 2008 schema
> to the Windows 2008R2 schema (s4)?
>
> Matthias
>
> Zahari Zahariev wrote:
>
>> (Resending with smaller attachment)
>>
>> Hello Matthias,
>>
>> I understand your situation. Here are the three diff files as LDAPCMP
>> shows them now for yesterday Samba4 (default provision) vs Win2008
>> functional level 2008 (not R2).
>>
>> I believe the last time I have run that for SCHEMA there were 0
>> differences but now there are quite a few. Maybe someone has upgraded the
>> Schema at some point.
>>
>> Tell me what do you think.
>>
>> -Zahari
>>
>> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Zahari Zahariev <
>> zahari.zahariev at gmail.com <mailto:zahari.zahariev at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Matthias,
>>
>> I understand your situation. Here are the three diff files as
>> LDAPCMP shows them now for yesterday Samba4 (default provision) vs
>> Win2008 functional level 2008 (not R2).
>>
>> I believe the last time I have run that for SCHEMA there were 0
>> differences but now there are quite a few. Maybe someone has
>> upgraded the Schema at some point.
>>
>> Tell me what do you think.
>>
>> -Zahari
>>
>>
>>
>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list