s4: renaming lp_ => conf_

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Tue May 18 03:59:35 MDT 2010

On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 11:52 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> Hi,
> at SambaXP we discussed to rename the lp_* functions in s4 to
> conf_* to avoid symbol conflists with s3.
> If someone starts to do this, please don't use conf_* as prefix,
> I think something like lparm_* or lp_ctx_* would be a better name.
> This will less likely produce conflicts with external headers/libraries.

Isn't C fun :-).  I don't like lparm_* or lp_ctx_* but I get your point.

I haven't proposed to do the rename as I'm just not the kind of expert I
would want to be to catch all the cases and not spend all day and night
fixing up the breakage ;-)

Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20100518/57af8b7c/attachment.pgp>

More information about the samba-technical mailing list