patch S4: Winbind, implement getgroups
Matthieu Patou
mat+Informatique.Samba at matws.net
Mon Mar 8 12:21:12 MST 2010
Hello Kai,
I guess that the patches are ok now as I merge the comment and
reformating in the get_groups patch and I made it clearer that
implementation of WINBINDD_PAM_LOGOFF is done (as a stub but still).
Maybe Andrew B can merge those patches ?
Matthieu.
> On Thursday 04 March 2010 14:56:46 Matthieu Patou wrote:
>
> Hi Matthieu,
>
>> I repushed everything in my branch I added tag end_reviewable to mark
>> the limit of changeset that should be reviewed (because after it's more
>> work in progress).
>> I changed this:
>>
>> * remove big chunck of commented code
>> * reorganize getgroups to have send and after receive (also in
>> wb_samba4_cmd.c)
>> * make it cleaner for Andrew B. needs
>
> The patches look much better now, but I still have two little nitpicks:
>
> In patch 43ea249a432c5fdd3aab72f1434e90668150e4ae (stub implementation of
> WINBINDD_PAM_LOGOFF), please move the case statement above the "unimplemented"
> comment. For the purpose of that switch statement, it is implemented even if
> it's only a stub.
>
> Also, can you please merge 3c524a90c6fc95ecbb13b3953ef80cd2e7c740aa (comments
> and reformatting) to the appropriate changes? There's no reason to keep this
> as a separate commit.
>
> Cheers,
> Kai
>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list