[Bug 7040] provisioning fails with alpha11

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Wed Jan 20 18:39:02 MST 2010

On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 19:50 -0500, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Attached are the proposed patches for this bug:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7040
> Patch #1 registers NULL handlers for DSDB_CONTROL_DN_STORAGE_FORMAT_OID
> and LDB_CONTROL_AS_SYSTEM_OID. Is this correct?

We should not have a network implementation of LDB_CONTROL_AS_SYSTEM_OID
- for security this should never be accepted over LDAP.  

We should also figure out what is causing
DSDB_CONTROL_DN_STORAGE_FORMAT_OID to get to the backend, without being
intercepted and interpreted by the extended_dn_out module. 

> Patch #2 fixes some typos and redundant provisioning code.
> Patch #3 adds msDS-NcType into samba4Top.

These look good. 

> The patches are also available here:
> http://github.com/endisd/samba/tree/development
> I have tested them against the default backend, OpenLDAP, and FDS.
> Should I attach them in the bug? Thanks!

It's always good to attach them there, if I don't get to it right away. 

Thanks for looking at this!

Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20100121/88febfd2/attachment.pgp>

More information about the samba-technical mailing list