[Bug 7040] provisioning fails with alpha11
abartlet at samba.org
Wed Jan 20 18:39:02 MST 2010
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 19:50 -0500, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Attached are the proposed patches for this bug:
> Patch #1 registers NULL handlers for DSDB_CONTROL_DN_STORAGE_FORMAT_OID
> and LDB_CONTROL_AS_SYSTEM_OID. Is this correct?
We should not have a network implementation of LDB_CONTROL_AS_SYSTEM_OID
- for security this should never be accepted over LDAP.
We should also figure out what is causing
DSDB_CONTROL_DN_STORAGE_FORMAT_OID to get to the backend, without being
intercepted and interpreted by the extended_dn_out module.
> Patch #2 fixes some typos and redundant provisioning code.
> Patch #3 adds msDS-NcType into samba4Top.
These look good.
> The patches are also available here:
> I have tested them against the default backend, OpenLDAP, and FDS.
> Should I attach them in the bug? Thanks!
It's always good to attach them there, if I don't get to it right away.
Thanks for looking at this!
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the samba-technical