Panic due to double free was Re: Fwd: BUILD of samba_4_0_test:master BROKEN on SerNet-NetBSD5 with gcc AT REVISION ea510ae16cc7103bb001469b644415b2867ff347
mat at samba.org
Sat Dec 18 02:26:14 MST 2010
Hello Kamen !
> It turns out it is all my fault for this segfault and unstable work 'make test'
> execution. I think I've fixed it properly now.
Great (not you break hein ;-)
> @Jelmer: Actually this was a regression. Sorry for I've misslead you!
> I appologies to all of you for introducing this temporary instability!
> I should have tested it even more thoroughly than I did :(
Does it means that samba4.rpc.samr.large-dc.one(vampire_dc)
andsamba4.rpc.samr.large-dc.two(vampire_dc) are fixed ?
If so can I suggest you to have a look at
It's a flaky test that really poison the result of the build on the
build farm (and so generate false alert that leads to people ignoring
alert emails). Matthieu.
Samba Team http://samba.org
Private repo http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary
More information about the samba-technical