Panic due to double free was Re: Fwd: BUILD of samba_4_0_test:master BROKEN on SerNet-NetBSD5 with gcc AT REVISION ea510ae16cc7103bb001469b644415b2867ff347

[Matthieu Patou]

Hello Kamen !


> Hi,
>
> It turns out it is all my fault for this segfault and unstable work 'make test'
> execution. I think I've fixed it properly now.
>
Great (not you break hein ;-)
> @Jelmer: Actually this was a regression. Sorry for I've misslead you!
>
> I appologies to all of you for introducing this temporary instability!
> I should have tested it even more thoroughly than I did :(
Does it means that samba4.rpc.samr.large-dc.one(vampire_dc) 
andsamba4.rpc.samr.large-dc.two(vampire_dc) are fixed ?

If so can I suggest you to have a look at 
samba4.drs.fsmo.python(vampire_dc)

It's a flaky test that really poison the result of the build on the 
build farm (and so generate false alert that leads to people ignoring 
alert emails). Matthieu.


-- 
Matthieu Patou
Samba Team        http://samba.org
Private repo      http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary