status of the s4 waf build - go to stage 3?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 12:59 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> Hi Tridge,
> 
> > Most developers building s4 now seem to have switched to the waf
> > build and everyone seems to be pretty happy with it.
> >
> > At this stage it may make sense to go to "stage 3" for use of waf in
> > Samba4 (as per the original proposal). That would mean:
> 
> We still have a few missing features, we need to fix.

Which features are those?  As far as I can tell, every Samba4 developer
is already using the waf build, and the old one is rotting fast.  What
is gained by holding up the change?  

I would like to make a new alpha with the waf build soon, so we need to
change the default as soon as possible. 

> Yes, we should maintain both for a while.

Why?  (Particularly if we have decided to abandon the merged build in
the short term). 

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20100423/b119658f/attachment.pgp>