Rebranding moving code around.
jra at samba.org
Thu Apr 22 22:20:06 MDT 2010
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:57:01AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:27:23PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > I know that's what tridge wants to do. I'm not clever
> > enough to do that :-). My personal feeling is that changing
> > the current Samba3 fileserver (renamed just fileserver) to
> > use the Samba4 (renamed Samba-ad) directory services as separate
> > processes using IPC is the way to go.
> Having them united under the same architectural umbrella is
> probably a worthwile long-term goal. But the Samba3 smbd is
> still years away from being able to achieve that goal. As an
> intermediate solution, I also think that using the standard
> protocols for IPC between s3 and s4 is the way to go:
> SMB[1,2], LDAP, MSRPC and so on.
Architectural umbrella is one thing, a single binary is
another :-). I really think they should be separate cooperating
processes communicating via RPC. Built out of the same tree
using the same codebase, yes, but not in a single binary.
I don't want to worry about destabalizing the AD server when
I'm messing with the SMB2 server (and I'm sure vica verca :-).
My 2 cents.
More information about the samba-technical