proposal: merge waf build of s4 to master

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 10:27 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:

> I don't think I objected to converting the pure Samba4 build
> to waf. If you find a mail where I did so, I hereby
> apologize for it.

No worries.  What I was getting at is that if Samba4 decides to move to
waf, then the merged build must eventually follow (or else we end up
with 3 build systems).  This brings in a Samba3 dependency, and hence
why I'm interested in trying to understand your position.

My hope is that when Kai finishes his work that you will like it, but I
understand it if you don't. 

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20100406/f41d8633/attachment.pgp>