proposal: merge waf build of s4 to master
Volker Lendecke
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Mon Apr 5 03:08:17 MDT 2010
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 06:58:40PM +1000, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> > Go to an arbitrary default Solaris/AIX/Whatever box (Solaris
> > is most popular for me), download samba-latest.tar.gz, type
> > in ./configure;make and get a (possibly not fancy) smbd.
>
> I presume you wouldn't mind if the non-python version was called
> something other than configure?
Sure. I don't see the technical requirement to rename it
(does waf depend on being called configure?), but if this
needs to be done, so be it.
> For stage 2 of the proposed build change, the autotools build would be
> ./configure. If we decide to go to stage 3 for Samba3 (where the new
> build system becomes the default), then I'd suggest that the old
> configure script have a different name, so that ./configure gets the
> primary build system for the project.
Where does the need to convert Samba3 from? Who of the
Samba3 developers and users have complained about the build
system in Samba3?
Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20100405/b7f66849/attachment.pgp>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list