pidl facillitates illicit data sharing between idl files
tridge at samba.org
tridge at samba.org
Tue Sep 29 15:13:04 MDT 2009
Hi Sam,
> If I add a definition such as this, to my pidl file:
>
> typedef struct DATA_BLOB {
> uint8 *data;
> uint32 length;
> } DATA_BLOB;
There are two problems with this:
1) DATA_BLOB is a base type in pidl. It is not defined in any idl
file, but instead is a built-in type like uint32 and other base
types. Trying to re-define it is a bad idea.
2) the normal form for structure typedefs in pidl is:
typedef struct {
el1type el1;
el2type el2;
} NAME;
Notice that the first line does not contain the structure name.
> For my own benefit I just renamed by struct to avoid the collision, but
> I believe it is not intentional that one IDL file should cross-infect
> another in this way - or have I mis-understood?
you've re-defined a base type. All bets are off after that :-)
Cheers, Tridge
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list