[IPA] Storing SID in String Format
abartlet at samba.org
Thu Oct 1 21:28:56 MDT 2009
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 23:07 -0400, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
> ----- "Andrew Bartlett" <abartlet at samba.org> wrote:
> > Actually, I have a better idea. When you are able, use the name Samba3
> > uses. That way we are not further diverging the schemas folks will find
> > on the net. (sambaSid is the name for a string-format SID in Samba3).
> > See also the unloved but still mostly-passing-the-testsuite 'samba3sam'
> > mapping module. I would strongly suggest rather than just renaming all
> > the attributes with a 'Samba4' prefix, that you try and map them to the
> > right thing in your target schema, or the Samba3 schema. We don't need
> > more schemas out there.
> Thanks for your feedbacks. I initially picked the samba4 prefix because
> there's already some attributes/object classes using that prefix like
> samba4top and samba4rdn.
> I agree that we should try to reuse Samba3
> schema if possible, but there seems to be far fewer attribute type &
> object class definitions in Samba3 schema than those in AD schema.
Yep. It's just a suggestion for the cases where other standard or
accepted schema already exist. Even (as a last resort) the ns* schema
used by the existing adsync tool is better than inventing yet another
set of attributes.
> So let me change the mapping table with Samba3 schema as many as
> possible, then we'll review it again. Thanks!
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the samba-technical