tdb transaction nesting and ctdb

Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Mon Jun 15 15:44:45 GMT 2009

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:33:49AM -0400, simo wrote:
> But it is also dangerous, is speed more important in this case?
> I know it's a situation where we are between a rock and a hard place :-/

Ok, then we need a transactionless set of reg_db calls.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the samba-technical mailing list