tdb transaction nesting and ctdb

[Volker Lendecke]

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:33:49AM -0400, simo wrote:
> But it is also dangerous, is speed more important in this case?
> I know it's a situation where we are between a rock and a hard place :-/

Ok, then we need a transactionless set of reg_db calls.

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20090615/6bcede47/attachment.bin