tdb transaction nesting and ctdb

[simo]

On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 17:44 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:33:49AM -0400, simo wrote:
> > But it is also dangerous, is speed more important in this case?
> > I know it's a situation where we are between a rock and a hard place :-/
> 
> Ok, then we need a transactionless set of reg_db calls.

Maybe have a global option that can be flipped during startup only that
will make reg_db skip transaction calls ? Then we could wrap them in an
outer transaction.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <simo at samba.org>
Principal Software Engineer at Red Hat, Inc. <simo at redhat.com>