RPC-SAMR-LARGE-DC test
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
Thu Jun 4 06:23:05 GMT 2009
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 16:05 +1000, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> > I'll patch up the easy cases - mistakes in the test - but I have serious
> > reservations about having tests in smbtorture that cannot be verified
> > against windows domains, and can't see how the groups and aliases test
> > can still remain.
>
> The test did serve one very useful purpose - it pointed out a
> significant performance problem we have with ldb indexes, which is
> what has led to the re-working of indexes I recently proposed (but
> have yet to implement).
Even the work so far seems to have made a big difference to performance
on 1500 users.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20090604/c3f6bbf8/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list