[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated -
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Tue Jul 7 11:11:30 GMT 2009
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 05:42:12PM -0500, Tim Prouty wrote:
> commit e4a85da5708a08f06a50f4f6b95e22d0e148d85e
> Author: Tim Prouty <tprouty at samba.org>
> Date: Tue Jun 30 16:41:48 2009 -0700
> s3 onefs: Fix failure in POSIX smbtorture test
> The return value of readlink was a bool instead of an int,
> which caused the length of the returned value to never be
I've been thinking about the lack of compiler checking in
the VFS for a while now. Would it make sense to rewrite the
VFS so that every module has to fill in the functions into a
typed struct? I think one of the reasons why the VFS exists
as it is now was the pain to fill large almost-empty struct.
With the C99 style initializers that pain has gone now.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20090707/f3e6cf9a/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical