the sorry saga of the talloc soname 'fix'

Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Mon Jul 6 11:32:57 GMT 2009

Hi, Tridge!

On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:22:55PM +1000, tridge at wrote:
> All of this is both an API change (although I would claim only for
> code that was already broken!) and an ABI change. Thus we need a new
> .so number.

Thanks for the explanation.

So if we skipped the "location" piece of the change, the
error messages would get a lot less useful, and the only
real change would be to create memory leaks in already
broken code. Right?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :

More information about the samba-technical mailing list