the sorry saga of the talloc soname 'fix'
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Mon Jul 6 11:32:57 GMT 2009
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:22:55PM +1000, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> All of this is both an API change (although I would claim only for
> code that was already broken!) and an ABI change. Thus we need a new
> .so number.
Thanks for the explanation.
So if we skipped the "location" piece of the change, the
error messages would get a lot less useful, and the only
real change would be to create memory leaks in already
broken code. Right?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20090706/85c91d85/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical