[PATCH][SAMBA4] 3 patches to get samba4 to build on OpenSolaris 08.11

[Torgeir Lerkerød]

> > From how I read it, it just checks for options that happen to be for
> > the IRIX CC - and that it will not add any CFLAGS that don't exist.
> > Does this particular test fail on OpenSolaris for some reason?
> Becase the cc gives something else back. Check SunX on the build farm to
see
> the same thing.

> sunX doesn't build with --enable-developer, so doesn't hit this problem.
> What does this option do exactly that breaks stuff on OpenSolaris? Are
> the characters in -fullwarn interpreted as individual options? What
> breaks?

It's interperted as an invalid option.


>
> > > > > 0002-Fix-include.patch:
> > > > >  This should ideally go into heimdal upstream, as the code is
> > > > >  imported from there.
> > > > Well it wouldn't have been a problem if samba 4's heimdal version
> wasn't
> > > > from aug 2008. There are other fixes like this in there done by
> metze. So
> > > > this needs to go in to build on Solaris until somebody do an upgrade
> of
> > > > heimdal... Of'course you can ignor Solaris as a platform, but if
> not....
> > > I'm quite sure we've imported changes from Heimdal since august, and
> the
> > > diff with Heimdal is quite small these days.
> > The date was 28 of aug 2008. You can find the tree that went in her :
> >
> http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=metze/heimdal/wip.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/lorikeet-heimdal
> > .
> > And as a reference there are numberous commits by metze fixing things
> like
> > this in source4/heimdal from about 2 weeks back to get samba 4 to build
> on
> > other systems....
> The last import was from 27 October,
> 2b29b7186459d945ec448694164bfe4239b30d72 and
>
> http://git.samba.org/?p=metze/heimdal/wip.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/lorikeet-heimdal-200810271034
>
> I wasn't aware we still had this many changes against Heimdal, I'll put
> it in.
>
> Unfortunately the patch I already committed broke some other hosts, so I
> had to revert it. Does cpp on Solaris assume that all input files are C
> files, or is there some option to specify the file type?


Hmm... I swear I tested it... Sorry about that. I can only check with the
compiler I use, which is the november edition of Sun Studio. Sun cc doesn't
need a flag as it defaults to -Xa which is Sun version of "Assume ANSI C
complince", which also by default enables -xc99.

Regards,
Torgeir