[PATCH] Add infrastructure for gathering statistics on SMB messages

[Tim Prouty]

On Feb 5, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Todd Stecher wrote:

>> The problem is -- without a module that we can test against,
>> it's very likely that changes in process.c or somewhere else
>> will just break your module again. So you don't really gain
>> a lot without a sample modules everyone runs.
>>
>> Don't get me wrong, the interface to me looks really good.
>> But without having it in a runnable form, it's really hard
>> to keep it functional.
>
> Ok - I talked to Tim - I'll build one tonight / tomorrow so you have
> something to test against.  I'll get that pushed ASAP - right now, all
> of my build machines / repositories are building (slow VMs...), so I
> won't be able to get this done until tomorrow.  It will likely closely
> resemble the OneFS module + some user mode storage for the values (I
> think I'll pull parts of the profiling code into the module).

Pushed part 1.  A generalized perfcount module should be done and  
pushed soon.

-Tim