scannedonly vfs module ported to samba 3.5

[Olivier Sessink]

Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 03:47:53PM +0100, Olivier Sessink wrote:
>> Thanks, implemented that.
>>
>> A last question (I think): I currently use a global static variable
>> gsendbuffer which holds  filesnames that are to be sent to the virus
>> scanner. This assumes that a single samba process works on one share
>> (different share definitions might use different virus scanners).
>>
>> Is this assumption correct?
> 
> No, it is not. You might want to look at
> SMB_VFS_HANDLE_[GS]ET_DATA and some sample uses in other
> modules. I must admit these macros are old, ugly and need
> to be replaced, but they are right now the preferred way to
> have per-instance specific VFS data.

and the data field in the 'struct vfs_handle_struct' pointer that is
passed to the connect function, is that a 'per share' structure?

regards,
	Olivier