scannedonly vfs module ported to samba 3.5

Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Fri Dec 11 04:44:17 MST 2009


On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 03:47:53PM +0100, Olivier Sessink wrote:
> Thanks, implemented that.
> 
> A last question (I think): I currently use a global static variable
> gsendbuffer which holds  filesnames that are to be sent to the virus
> scanner. This assumes that a single samba process works on one share
> (different share definitions might use different virus scanners).
> 
> Is this assumption correct?

No, it is not. You might want to look at
SMB_VFS_HANDLE_[GS]ET_DATA and some sample uses in other
modules. I must admit these macros are old, ugly and need
to be replaced, but they are right now the preferred way to
have per-instance specific VFS data.

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20091211/d60f0b6c/attachment.pgp>


More information about the samba-technical mailing list