Common code into source/ or toplevel? (Re: Suggested "combined tree" conditions for success)

[Kai Blin]

On Monday 15 September 2008 09:25:53 Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:

> I'd propose to move them to source/, to that all 3 ways of building
> code in the master branch have the same weight. I assume have the magic
> of the combined build in the top level directory would give more weight
> to the most experimental way of building samba.

Hm, I actually liked the idea of being able to build from the top dir, instead 
of having to cd into the source/ dir. We could get started on moving the 
tests from the various test dirs closer to the code they test and clean up 
there as well if clutter in the root dir is an issue.

My proposal is to have a Makefile in the root dir and have that build s3 
on "make samba3", s4 on "make samba4" and franky on "make franky". I'm open 
for suggestions on what should fall out of the tree on a plain "make". :)

Cheers,
Kai

-- 
Kai Blin
WorldForge developer  http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer        http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member     http://www.samba.org/samba/team/
--
Will code for cotton.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20080915/6e15b0ae/attachment.bin