[RFC] Suggested "combined tree" for easier development and Franky integration.

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Fri Sep 5 21:50:48 GMT 2008

On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 17:33 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 05:17:14PM +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> > We need to discuss how to handle the remaining duplicates from the old Samba3 
> > and Samba4 trees. I'm looking forward to suggestions on how to improve the 
> > migration guide as well.
> The only real clash I see is the swat/ directory. It should
> be easy to rename swat/ to swat3/ for example.

Or I could just finish wielding the axe on Samba4's SWAT :-)

I'm really intrigued by this work - in particular the hope that we could
start sharing code by default, rather than only as a result of
deliberate effort.

Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20080906/9b069c6a/attachment.bin

More information about the samba-technical mailing list